Make Manila Great Again: A Call for Accountability and Political Awakening

Manila, the heart of the Philippines, a city bursting with history, culture, and resilience, has long been a symbol of Filipino grit. Yet, for decades, it has also been a reflection of political neglect, corruption, and mismanagement. The rallying cry of Mayor Isko Moreno, “Make Manila Great Again,” ignites a renewed hope—a call to restore the city’s dignity, its infrastructure, and its people’s trust. But beyond Manila’s borders, the larger question looms: Are Filipinos truly learning from past mistakes? Or are we condemned to repeat them, ensnared by apathy and a cycle of poor governance? The Manila of Yesterday and Today Manila’s history is marred by cycles of decline and fleeting revival. Under successive administrations, the city’s streets, public services, and social fabric have often suffered from neglect. Yet, it was under Mayor Isko Moreno’s leadership that a beacon of hope was rekindled. His campaign to “Make Manila Great Again” is more than a slogan; it’s a promise to undo years of deterioration, to restore pride, and to prioritize the well-being of its citizens. However, recent developments cast a shadow over this renewed optimism.

The previous administration under Dr. Honey Lacuna, who took office amid the hopes of continuing progress, left behind a trail of unresolved issues—most notably, a staggering 10 billion pesos worth of garbage left uncollected. This isn’t merely a matter of trash; it is a glaring symbol of governance failure, of priorities misplaced, and of resources squandered. The Garbage Crisis: A Symbol of Governance Failures The garbage problem in Manila, which Lacuna’s administration inherited and ostensibly failed to resolve, is emblematic of deeper systemic issues. Public funds allocated for waste management, urban development, and social services are supposed to serve the people. Instead, they often become pawns in a game of political patronage, misappropriation, or outright corruption. The magnitude of the trash left behind—more than 10 billion pesos worth—raises questions about accountability. Where did these funds go? Were they properly utilized? Or were they siphoned off through questionable transactions? The apparent mismanagement suggests a broader pattern in Philippine local governance, where funds meant for development are diverted or misused, only to surface later as unresolved problems that burden the taxpayer.

Adding fuel to the fire are recent reports of questionable fund transfers made by the Lacuna administration during the midday hours of the May elections. Such transfers, allegedly made in the midst of a politically sensitive period, raise eyebrows about the motives behind these transactions. Are public funds being used to influence political outcomes? Is there a pattern of election-related corruption that continues to plague Philippine local governments? These acts threaten the very foundations of democracy. When public funds are manipulated for political gain, trust erodes. Citizens are left questioning whether their hard-earned taxes are being used to serve their communities or line the pockets of political elites. This undermines the integrity of elections and weakens the social contract between government and the governed.

Manila’s woes are not isolated; they are symptomatic of a larger malaise affecting Philippine local governance. Across the country, stories abound of funds being siphoned post-elections—sometimes into zero-sum accounts, fragmented into crumbs, or simply vanished without explanation. Public officials often operate in a system where accountability is weak, oversight is superficial, and impunity reigns. This cycle of corruption is perpetuated by a populace that, over decades, has grown politically apathetic. Many Filipinos have become resigned to the notion that corruption is inevitable, that their votes are futile, and that change is impossible within the current system. This apathy, whether born out of frustration or cynicism, has allowed corrupt officials to thrive, leaving the people to suffer the consequences.

Have Filipinos truly learned their lessons? Or are we doomed to remain passive spectators in a political theater characterized by corruption, incompetence, and neglect? The answer, unfortunately, is complex. On one hand, there are signs of awakening—youth movements, civic organizations, and whistleblowers who challenge the status quo. The rise of social media has empowered citizens to expose corruption and demand accountability. On the other hand, the entrenched political dynasties, patronage politics, and voter apathy continue to undermine these efforts. Many Filipinos still accept flawed leadership as the norm. They vote based on personality, popularity, or patronage rather than policy or competence. This weakens the very foundation of democracy and enables corrupt officials to perpetuate their hold on power.

The path to genuine progress requires a collective awakening—a realization that change begins with informed, active citizens willing to hold their leaders accountable. It demands a shift from complacency to activism, from apathy to engagement. Educating voters about their rights, exposing corrupt practices, and demanding transparency should be central to this movement. Local governments must prioritize good governance, transparency, and accountability, ensuring that public funds are used effectively for the people’s benefit. Furthermore, genuine political reforms are essential. These include stricter oversight mechanisms, anti-corruption laws, and the nurturing of political leaders who are committed to public service rather than personal gain. Electoral reforms are also necessary to reduce the influence of dynasties and to promote merit-based leadership.

Leadership plays a pivotal role in shaping the political landscape. Mayor Isko Moreno’s call to “Make Manila Great Again” is an inspiring rallying cry. It signifies a desire for renewal, for leaders who prioritize service over self-interest, and for a government that works for the common good. But leadership alone cannot solve systemic problems. It must be complemented by an active, vigilant citizenry. When people see their leaders genuinely working for change, it fuels hope and encourages participation. Conversely, when corruption and mismanagement persist unchecked, cynicism deepens.

“Make Manila Great Again” is more than a slogan; it’s a moral imperative. It challenges Filipinos to reflect on their collective responsibility—to demand accountability, to vote wisely, and to participate actively in governance. It calls for a cultural shift from resignation to resilience, from apathy to activism. The Philippines stands at a crossroads. The lessons of the past—of corruption, neglect, and political manipulation—must serve as warnings, not just history to be forgotten. The future depends on whether Filipinos will rise above their disillusionment and reclaim their democracy. Change is possible. It begins with awareness, continues with action, and culminates in a nation that values honesty, integrity, and service. Manila’s revival is a microcosm of what the entire country can achieve if its people unite in purpose and resolve. The time for complacency has passed. The time for political awakening is now. Let us heed Mayor Moreno’s call. Let us make Manila—and the Philippines—great again, not just in words, but in deeds. The future of our nation depends on it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *