The infamy Julie Anne San Jose unwittingly created for herself

Julie Anne San Jose as Ginebra San Miguel calendar girl for 2025 did not sit well for a lot of netizens.

Reactions to her recent launch were far from congratulatory. She was bashed left and right and people thought it was a wrong career move.

It didn’t help that her launch as a calendar girl came almost right on the heels of her singing inside a church altar.

There are a plethora of reasons why netizens were infuriated when Julie Anne sang inside a church.

One, they found her long gown with knee-high slit inappropriate for the venue.

Two, they thought that her performance of ABBA’s Dancing Queen was clearly out of place.  She could have sung gospel songs instead of a party song.

Not surprisingly, Julie Anne caught the collective ire of the netizens in the comment sections of various social media accounts when her calendar poster was launched.

“FROM CHURCH BROUHAHA TO A DARING VOICE KIDS COACH. WALA BANG IMAGE TEAM TO? GULONG GULO NA SI SATANAS SAYO BWAHAHAHA.”

“Gulong gulo ang @Sparkle_GMA team ano image gagawen d2 kay dancing starlet shuta!! D ata na consult si mr m!”

“Maganda nmn sya pero bakit pumayag  GMA ganyan ang concept & final editting.. parang gawa lang sa android app filter filer crop, edit.

“Ang tanda ng ng face niya? Sa true lang. hehe.”

“Parang concept is yung San Miguel logo pero ang vibe naging Panday. Hahaha. Una kong napansin yung maiksi na espada, parang laruan ng bata na nabibili sa divisoria.”

“Hindi sultry ang dating, yung labas ipin na tawa napaka off sa ganitong concept. parang bata na pinilit pasuot yung ganyan.”

“Kaya naman pala ang sexy sa simbahan at nag dancing queen pa.may pinaghahandaan pala.”

“Ampangit ng pagkaka edit. Dami ng magandang editing software eh. Anyare. Di maganda tuloy ng kinalabasan.”

“Bakit parang pungok cya.”

“Napaka waley naman nito! Daming sexy na artista bat sya? Wala talagang sex appeal eh! Magfocus ka nalng as a singer pls.”

“Eh waley din as a singer. Ilang beses na nirepackage at nilaunch. Talagang walang it factor ang ate mo.”

“They hired a cheap photographer? Pangit ng angles, she looks stubby in all the pics.”

“sa photoshop 9:55, sa isang pic ang laki ng ulo, parang si tweety bird! rookie yata taga edit nila, baka mura lang bayad…lol…anyway, di bagay kay Julie Ann San Jose! awkward! I agee w/ most of the comments here, tagalong na singer yan and Maranda naman, pero off ang dating.”

“not a very flattering shots of her. not proportion head and body, she looks small (pandak), yung first pic with the sword is a joke then yung smile na pa-cute tapos ganun yung outfit, hindi match talaga. medyo TH too. definitely a NO.”

“Super edited. Parang pinagkasya lang sa frame, so shortened ang legs, nakalimutan liitan ang face. Kaloka. Fire the editor at kung sinong nag approve niyan.”

“Bakit parang AI generated ung pictures? Parang gawang photolab lang.”

“Bakit ganun? Kakatawa mga photos parang trip lang?”

“Parang pang Instagram yung mga pic instead of calendar. Walang dating. Sayang.”

“There are women na naturally oozing with sex appeal kahit di pa magpakita ng cleavage. Although JAPS is not bad looking at may korte din naman at at her prime, pero sorry missing talaga yung sex appeal factor.. Mas may less beautiful, older at less physically sexy celebs pero abg lalakas ng ex appeal kesa sa kanya. Hindi natural at stiff sya tignan sa pictures para kahit anong sexy pa suot nya na damit nya at pose. It’s like she’s cosplaying a

D nga bagay yung smile. But looking at pic 2 i guess d maganda register nya pag d nakasmile? I dunno. I’m confused.”

 

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *